Original article from Kent Live
Health experts have cast doubt on Home Office claims that a former army barracks being used to house asylum seekers is COVID-safe following an outbreak earlier this year.
Nearly 200 people contracted the virus at Napier Barracks in Folkestone.
In April the Home Office declared the outbreak “over” and insisted asylum seekers were staying in “safe, suitable, COVID-compliant conditions”.
But last week two senior health officials said it was still “difficult to envisage” the site being considered COVID-safe.
Untold Stories – a new newsletter bringing together the very best journalism about and for our underserved and minority communities from across the south east.
Simply press here to enter your email address and get news, features and plenty more besides direct to your inbox.
And subscribe to the KentLive newsletter here for the latest breaking news and updates.
Around 270 people were living at the barracks as of last week, it is understood.
It comes as the Home Office faces renewed calls to shut the site, which has been described as “ghettoised, detention-like accommodation”.
Napier Barracks has been used by the Home Office to house hundreds of asylum seekers since September, many of whom had crossed the English Channel aboard small boats.
The site has been dogged by allegations of poor conditions in communal dormitories, with inspectors describing an isolation block as “unfit for habitation”.
In a letter to Home Affairs Committee chairwoman Yvette Cooper, dated June 2 and published on Wednesday (June 9), health experts raised concerns about the barracks.
The joint message from James Williams, director of public health for Medway Council, and Dr Allison Duggal, interim director of public health for Kent County Council, adds to the pressure on the Home Office to act.
They said: “The sizeable outbreak in the barracks is evidence that the accommodation has not been safe throughout the period of its use.
“KCC Public Health and colleagues from PHE (Public Health England) have worked with Home Office and their contractors to develop plans to improve COVID security and outbreak management plans at the Napier Barracks site.
“The work is ongoing, but it is difficult to envisage that the site can be considered COVID-safe given the proposed numbers of service users for this site.”
They also said they were “disappointed and surprised” that Kent County Council was not consulted before the barracks were confirmed for asylum accommodation in the first place.
They added that the county council had earlier been given assurances that no such accommodation would be set up in the county.
The letter was written the day before six asylum seekers formerly housed at Napier Barracks won a legal challenge against the Government as a High Court judge ruled their accommodation was inadequate.